Comparison · 2026
5 Best SHL Alternatives for Skills Assessment
Criteria Corp, Wonderlic and TestGorilla compared with SHL on price, anti-cheating and candidate drop-off, and which one fits which kind of hiring.
The short version
The most widely used SHL alternatives are Criteria Corp, Wonderlic, TestGorilla and Hogan Assessments, plus Cohesyve — which is our own product, so weigh this page accordingly. SHL itself is strongest for large organisations and graduate programmes that need validated, well-documented psychometric assessments with enterprise governance, and that have the volume to justify a consultative engagement. The right choice depends on what you need to measure, not on which tool has the longest feature list.
- Criteria Corp — Validated aptitude and personality tests with self-serve setup. Subscription; check their site.
- Wonderlic — Quick cognitive-ability screening. Subscription; check their site.
- TestGorilla — Broad library mixing skills, aptitude and personality tests. Subscription/tier-based; check their site.
- Hogan Assessments — Personality assessment for leadership and selection. Custom; contact sales.
A 30-minute call where we build an assessment for a role you are hiring now, so you can compare it with SHL on your own candidates.
SHL is one of the longest-established names in pre-employment testing, with a large catalogue of validated cognitive-ability, personality and situational-judgement assessments used by enterprises worldwide. It is the reference choice when validated psychometrics and enterprise governance are the priority. Teams look for an alternative when they want to test the actual work of a specific role rather than general aptitude, when procurement and cost are out of proportion to their hiring volume, or when they want a lighter, self-serve setup. This guide compares the best SHL alternatives for hiring teams, including Cohesyve.
Why teams look for a SHL alternative
- Assessments measure general aptitude and traits rather than the tasks a specific role involves
- Enterprise procurement, implementation and contracts are heavy for teams below large volume
- Standardised test batteries are familiar to candidates and widely practised
- The candidate experience can feel like an exam rather than a preview of the work
- Teams want to iterate on what they test without a vendor engagement
What SHL does well
SHL provides a broad portfolio of validated assessments — cognitive ability, personality questionnaires, situational judgement, skills tests and assessment-centre tooling — backed by decades of psychometric research and used across large organisations and graduate programmes. It sells on validity, fairness evidence and enterprise-grade governance, typically through custom agreements and consultative implementation. It is the standard choice for HR functions that need defensible, well-documented testing at scale.
Best for
Where SHL falls short
- General aptitude and trait measures do not show whether someone can do the specific job
- Enterprise pricing and implementation are disproportionate for smaller or variable hiring volumes
- Standardised batteries are well known and practised, which affects what scores mean
- Setup and changes typically go through the vendor rather than a self-serve interface
- Candidate experience is test-like rather than work-like
Cohesyve vs SHL
Cohesyve is our product. This is the comparison as we see it — check it against a trial of both.
| Cohesyve | SHL | |
|---|---|---|
| What is measured | Role-specific tasks generated from your job description | General cognitive ability, personality and situational judgement |
| Question uniqueness | A different assessment per candidate | Standardised, validated test batteries |
| Setup | Self-serve; paste a job description, ready in under 5 minutes | Consultative implementation |
| Pricing model | Volume-based subscription from $199/month, no seat fees | Enterprise agreement; contact sales |
| Candidate experience | A preview of the actual work | Timed aptitude and questionnaire formats |
| Pricing model | Transparent subscription sized to hiring volume | Enterprise pricing; contact sales |
| What it measures | Job-specific skills and judgement | Aptitude, personality, situational judgement |
| Question uniqueness | Unique assessment generated per candidate | Standardised batteries |
| Setup time | Under 5 minutes, self-serve | Implementation project |
| Role coverage | Any knowledge-based role | Broad, via general measures |
| Validation evidence | Rubric-based scoring you can review per role | Extensive published psychometric validation |
| Free trial | 10 free candidates on signup | Not self-serve; check their site |
| Contract terms | Monthly or annual, cancel anytime on monthly | Annual enterprise agreements |
Cohesyve
See the difference on one of your own roles
Paste a job description and Cohesyve builds a role-specific assessment with a scoring rubric. Ten candidates free, no card, so you can run it beside SHL on a live req.
The other SHL alternatives
Criteria Corp
Subscription; check their siteBest for Validated aptitude and personality tests with self-serve setup
Key difference Psychometrics without the enterprise procurement
Wonderlic
Subscription; check their siteBest for Quick cognitive-ability screening
Key difference A narrower, faster aptitude product
TestGorilla
Subscription/tier-based; check their siteBest for Broad library mixing skills, aptitude and personality tests
Key difference Self-serve breadth rather than psychometric depth
Hogan Assessments
Custom; contact salesBest for Personality assessment for leadership and selection
Key difference Personality-focused rather than a full battery
Which one should you pick?
Choose Cohesyve if
- You want to know whether a candidate can do the specific job, not their general aptitude
- You want to be live in minutes without an implementation project
- Your hiring volume does not justify an enterprise agreement
- You want candidates to experience the work, not an exam
Choose SHL if
- You need extensively validated psychometrics with published fairness evidence
- You run large graduate or volume programmes where standardised batteries are the norm
- Your legal or governance requirements call for a long-established vendor
- Personality and cognitive measures are central to your selection model
Common questions
What is the best SHL alternative?
If you want validated psychometrics with lighter procurement, Criteria Corp and Wonderlic are the usual choices. If you want to test the work of the specific role rather than general aptitude, Cohesyve generates a role-specific assessment from a job description — it is our own product, so run a trial against your current process.
Is SHL worth it?
For large organisations that need defensible, well-documented psychometric testing at scale, often yes. For a team hiring a few people a month, the cost and implementation effort are usually out of proportion, and a self-serve tool gets you a usable signal faster.
How is Cohesyve different from SHL?
SHL measures general traits and abilities through standardised, validated tests. Cohesyve measures whether a candidate can do the work of a specific role, using a unique assessment generated from your job description and scored against a rubric. It is self-serve and priced as a subscription from $199/month.
Do SHL tests predict job performance?
SHL publishes validation evidence for its measures, and general cognitive ability is a well-established predictor. What a general measure cannot tell you is whether someone can perform the specific tasks of your role, which is what a work-sample assessment is for. Many teams use both.
Cohesyve · Skill assessments for hiring
Try Cohesyve against SHL on a live role
We'll build an assessment for a role you're hiring right now, so you can compare the candidate experience and the results side by side rather than taking our word for it.
1,500+
assessments completed
50%
faster time-to-hire
90%
completion rate
5 min
from JD to assessment
No credit card · 10 free candidates · Plans sized to your hiring volume
From the blog