Cohesyve · Practice for candidates
Going for a Content Marketing Manager role? Find out how you'd actually score.
Run a Content Marketing Manager simulation built the same way employers build theirs, and get a full report showing exactly where you lost marks — before it counts.
5
free assessments a month
$0
no card required
Full
scored report every run
Every
question type included
5 free assessments a month · No card required · Pro from $16/mo
Overview
Content marketing assessments test editorial judgement as much as writing. You are usually asked to plan against a business goal, decide what is worth making and what is not, and then produce a short piece to show you can execute what you have planned. Employers use them because a portfolio shows what you wrote but not what you chose to write, or why. This page covers what the tasks look like and how they are scored.
Why employers assess this role
Published work is difficult to attribute — it may have been briefed, edited or heavily rewritten by someone else. A timed exercise shows both the planning judgement and the actual writing under the same conditions every other candidate faced.
What gets tested
The format
Duration
45–90 minutes
Question types
- Content plan against a stated business objective
- Writing exercise from a brief
- Editing or critiquing an existing piece
- Performance interpretation and prioritisation
Levels
Entry · Mid · Senior
What you'll be asked to do
Plan content against a goal
A business objective and a limited production capacity. Assessors watch whether you connect each piece to a reader and a stage of the buying decision, or simply generate topics.
- •Build a quarterly content plan to support a specific product with a small team
- •Decide which three pieces to make when eight have been requested internally
- •Plan the content that would support a sales team in a long, considered purchase
Write to a brief
A short piece produced under time pressure, usually with a defined audience, angle and length. The constraint is part of the test — over-running the word count is marked.
- •Write the opening 300 words of an article for a stated audience and angle
- •Write three headline options for the same piece and explain which you would run
- •Rewrite a paragraph in a supplied house tone of voice
Edit someone else's work
A draft with structural problems, not just typographic ones. Strong candidates fix the argument; weaker ones only tidy the sentences.
- •Cut a 900-word draft to 500 without losing the argument
- •Identify why a piece loses the reader after the introduction
- •Restructure an article that buries its most useful section at the end
Judge what worked
Content performance data with an ambiguity in it — high traffic and no conversions, or a low-traffic piece that sales use constantly.
- •Decide whether a high-traffic, low-conversion piece should be reworked or retired
- •Choose which existing pieces to update rather than writing something new
- •Say what you would measure for content aimed at readers who will not buy for months
Cohesyve for candidates
Practise a Content Marketing Manager assessment before the real one
Run the same AI job simulations companies use to evaluate applicants. You get a scored report showing where you're strong and where you're not, plus what to work on.
Sample tasks — and what strong looks like
You have capacity for four pieces this quarter and a goal of supporting a specific product. Choose and justify them.
MidWhat strong looks like: Each piece has a named reader, a question that reader is actually asking, and a stated role in the decision they are making. Weak plans list topics by theme and assume a volume of publishing will produce a result.
Write the first 300 words of an article for a supplied brief and audience.
EntryWhat strong looks like: Opens on the reader's problem rather than on the organisation, makes a specific claim early, and reads as though written by someone who understands the subject. Weak openings spend the first paragraph restating the topic and the second explaining why the topic matters.
Cut a supplied 900-word draft to 500 words without losing its argument.
MidWhat strong looks like: Removes whole sections that repeat or delay the point, keeps the evidence, and tightens sentences last. Weak edits trim adjectives evenly across the piece and end up with something shorter but equally slow.
A piece attracts substantial traffic and produces almost no enquiries. Decide what to do with it.
SeniorWhat strong looks like: Asks first whether the traffic is the intended audience at all, distinguishes a piece doing an early-stage job well from one attracting the wrong reader, and commits to either a rework with a specific change or a decision to leave it. Weak answers add a call to action and move on.
How to prepare
- #1
Practise writing to a strict word count and a timer, because content assessments are usually failed on pacing rather than on prose quality.
- #2
Rehearse justifying a content plan piece by piece, naming the reader and the question each piece answers.
- #3
Practise tone matching by taking a supplied paragraph and rewriting it in two clearly different house voices.
- #4
Work on structural editing specifically: take a long draft and cut it by half without losing the argument.
- #5
Learn to state a measurement approach for content that does not convert immediately, since that question appears frequently and is often answered badly.
- #6
Read a few briefs closely and note what they leave undefined, then practise stating the assumption rather than quietly filling the gap.
Common mistakes
Producing a topic list with no reader, no angle and no stated purpose per piece.
Writing past the word count, which is treated as a failure to follow the brief.
Opening on the organisation and its product rather than on the reader's problem.
Editing at sentence level when the piece has a structural problem.
Treating traffic as the outcome rather than as an input to one.
Matching a house tone by copying its vocabulary while ignoring its sentence rhythm and level of formality.
How it's scored
| Criterion | What strong looks like |
|---|---|
| Editorial judgement | Clear reasoning about what is worth making and what is not, with the discarded ideas named. |
| Writing quality | Specific, readable prose that makes a claim and supports it, rather than competent sentences that say nothing in particular. |
| Audience grounding | A named reader with a real question, visible in the angle and the level of assumed knowledge. |
| Brief adherence | Length, tone, audience and format all match what was asked, with any deviation stated deliberately. |
| Measurement thinking | A stated view of what success looks like for the piece, appropriate to how far it sits from a purchase decision. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Will I be asked to write a full article?
Rarely. Most assessments ask for an opening section, a set of headline options or a rewritten passage, because those show voice and structure without needing an hour of drafting.
How much does search knowledge matter?
It matters as reasoning about what a reader is trying to find, not as keyword tooling. Assessors reward a candidate who can explain the intent behind a query and what a useful answer would contain.
Am I marked on grammar and typographic errors?
They are noticed, particularly in a role where writing is the output, but they rarely decide the result on their own. Structural problems and a missed brief cost far more.
Can I bring my portfolio instead?
Portfolios usually sit alongside the assessment rather than replacing it, because published work cannot be attributed with confidence and does not show how you work to a deadline.
What is the best way to practise before a real one?
Sit a timed, scored version rather than writing samples at your own pace. Cohesyve includes five free assessments a month with a full report, which will tell you whether you are losing marks on planning, on the writing itself or on the brief.
Practise another role
Cohesyve · Practice for candidates
Practise a Content Marketing Manager assessment now — free.
Five scored assessments a month, a full report on every run, and a learning pathway built from what you got wrong. No card required.
5
free assessments a month
$0
no card required
Full
scored report every run
Every
question type included
5 free assessments a month · No card required · Pro from $16/mo
For hiring teams
Hiring for a Content Marketing Manager role? See how your applicants perform before you spend interview time.