Cohesyve · Practice for candidates
Going for a Marketing Manager role? Find out how you'd actually score.
Run a Marketing Manager simulation built the same way employers build theirs, and get a full report showing exactly where you lost marks — before it counts.
5
free assessments a month
$0
no card required
Full
scored report every run
Every
question type included
5 free assessments a month · No card required · Pro from $16/mo
Overview
Marketing manager assessments rarely ask you to list channels. They hand you a situation — a budget, a target, a product that is not selling as well as it should — and ask what you would do with it. The work is written and scored against how a real plan would be judged: is the audience defined, is the spend justified, would you know within a month whether it worked. This page covers the formats, the scoring and how to prepare for one.
Why employers assess this role
Marketing is unusually easy to describe well and difficult to do well, and campaign results on a CV are almost never attributable to one person. A written exercise puts every candidate on the same brief, so an employer can compare reasoning rather than compare the size of the companies people have worked at.
What gets tested
The format
Duration
45–90 minutes
Question types
- Campaign plan against a written brief
- Budget and channel allocation exercise
- Performance data interpretation
- Short written artefact — a brief, a plan summary or a stakeholder update
Levels
Entry · Mid · Senior
What you'll be asked to do
Plan a campaign from a brief
You are given a product, an audience, a budget and a commercial goal, usually with one detail deliberately missing. Assessors watch whether you define the audience before choosing channels, or the other way round.
- •Plan a three-month launch campaign for a new product line on a fixed budget
- •Design a campaign to win back customers who have lapsed in the last year
- •Build a plan to support a sales team entering a market the organisation has not sold into before
Allocate a budget across channels
A fixed sum and more channel options than it will cover. The split matters less than whether you state the reasoning and say what you are choosing not to fund.
- •Split a quarterly budget across paid, organic, events and content, and justify each line
- •Decide what to cut when the budget is reduced part-way through a quarter
- •Argue for moving spend from a channel that looks efficient but is not growing
Interpret campaign performance
A table of channel results, usually with a trap in it — a channel with excellent click-through and no conversions, or a spike explained by a single unrepresentable week.
- •Explain why cost per lead fell while cost per customer rose
- •Decide whether a channel with strong engagement and weak pipeline should keep its budget
- •Identify what additional data you would need before concluding a campaign worked
Write for a commercial audience
A short written piece pitched at people who do not work in marketing. Structure, clarity and what you choose to leave out are all marked.
- •Write the one-page plan summary you would send to a finance director
- •Write the update explaining a campaign that underperformed and what happens next
- •Write the creative brief you would hand to a designer or agency
Cohesyve for candidates
Practise a Marketing Manager assessment before the real one
Run the same AI job simulations companies use to evaluate applicants. You get a scored report showing where you're strong and where you're not, plus what to work on.
Sample tasks — and what strong looks like
You have a fixed quarterly budget and a target for qualified leads. Set out the plan and the split.
MidWhat strong looks like: Names the audience and the buying trigger before naming a channel, allocates against where that audience already is, holds back a portion for testing, and states the assumption connecting spend to the lead target. Weak submissions list every channel with an even split and no stated reasoning.
A channel has the lowest cost per lead in the mix but contributes almost no closed revenue. Decide what to do.
MidWhat strong looks like: Treats the gap as a lead-quality question rather than a cost question, asks what the leads from that channel have in common, and proposes a change that could be judged within a defined window. Weak answers either defend the channel on cost per lead alone or cut it outright without testing why the quality differs.
Write the brief for a campaign you have just planned, for a designer who has not seen the strategy.
EntryWhat strong looks like: Gives the audience, the single message, the action wanted, the constraints and what success looks like, in that order and on one page. Weak briefs describe the deliverables and the deadline but never state what the work has to make someone think or do.
The organisation wants to enter an adjacent market. Set out how you would establish whether the current positioning transfers.
SeniorWhat strong looks like: Separates what is genuinely different about the new buyer from what is merely unfamiliar, proposes a cheap test before committing spend, and names the evidence that would cause a rethink. Weak answers rewrite the messaging immediately with no basis for the changes.
How to prepare
- #1
Practise writing a plan that starts with the audience and the behaviour you want to change, because a plan that opens with channels reads as a media schedule rather than a strategy.
- #2
Rehearse justifying a budget line in one sentence each. Assessors mark the reasoning, and unexplained allocations score as guesses.
- #3
Work through a few channel performance tables and force yourself to name what the data cannot tell you before drawing a conclusion.
- #4
Practise writing a creative brief to a real constraint, since briefing is one of the most commonly assessed and least commonly practised parts of the role.
- #5
Prepare a habit of stating one measurable success criterion per campaign element, and a timeframe by which you would know.
- #6
Do at least one timed run end to end. Marketing plans expand indefinitely, and running out of time before the measurement section is a frequent failure.
Common mistakes
Choosing channels before defining who is being reached and what they currently believe.
Splitting the budget evenly across everything so no choice has to be defended.
Quoting engagement figures as if they were commercial outcomes.
Writing a plan with no measurement section, or one added as an afterthought in the last two minutes.
Describing tactics at length while never stating the message the campaign is trying to land.
Presenting a plan with no acknowledgement of what was deliberately left out or deprioritised.
How it's scored
| Criterion | What strong looks like |
|---|---|
| Audience and positioning | A specific audience with a stated problem and a message aimed at it, rather than a demographic description that would fit any campaign. |
| Commercial reasoning | Spend is connected to an outcome with a visible assumption, and the candidate can say what would make the assumption wrong. |
| Prioritisation | Clear choices, with the discarded options named and the cost of discarding them acknowledged. |
| Data interpretation | Reads past the headline metric, notices where a number is flattering, and states what further evidence would settle the question. |
| Written clarity | Structured, concise and pitched at the named reader. A note to a finance director reads differently from a brief to a designer. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Will I be asked to produce a full campaign plan?
Usually a condensed one — an audience, a message, a channel plan with a budget split, and a measurement approach. Assessors are looking for the shape of your thinking, so depth in the reasoning matters more than length in the document.
Do I need to know the employer's market to answer well?
Some familiarity helps, but the brief normally supplies the context you need. What is marked is whether you use that context or answer from a generic template that would fit any product.
How much detail should the numbers go into?
Enough to show the logic connecting spend to outcome. A stated assumption with rough arithmetic scores well; precise-looking figures with no reasoning behind them do not.
Are these assessments the same at manager and senior level?
The format is similar but the weighting changes. Entry and mid briefs reward a well-executed plan; senior briefs introduce a conflict — a cut budget, a resistant stakeholder, an unproven market — and reward the decision you make about it.
How do I find out where I lose marks before it counts?
Sit a scored one first. Cohesyve runs five free assessments a month with a full report against each criterion, so you can see whether your plan loses points on positioning, on budget reasoning or on measurement.
Practise another role
Cohesyve · Practice for candidates
Practise a Marketing Manager assessment now — free.
Five scored assessments a month, a full report on every run, and a learning pathway built from what you got wrong. No card required.
5
free assessments a month
$0
no card required
Full
scored report every run
Every
question type included
5 free assessments a month · No card required · Pro from $16/mo
For hiring teams
Hiring for a Marketing Manager role? See how your applicants perform before you spend interview time.